I’ve been working on a tactical card game called Heartbreaker, for a little over a year now. In it, players each control a dark champion who fight each other to the death on a four-by-four grid with a pre-built deck.
The main challenges I was trying to overcome, were making a game that could be highly competitive, but without requiring a lot of money to play, while still having a high variety of tactics and that wasn’t a deckbuilder. The game draws inspiration from Yomi, Mage Wars, Ascension, Netrunner, and of course, Magic, the Gathering.
I love to play these competitive card games - but I don’t have the time of the money to buy and then customize my decks. Even on Hearthstone, I’m usually just looking up what the best decks are and then spending dust to craft them. This is not super fun to me.
The other big game design inspiration for Heartbreaker is fighting games, like Street Fighter, Guilty Gear, and King of Fighters. I am an awful at these games, but what I like about them is that each character is essentially a toolset of different moves, abilities, and stats (like how big their hitboxes are, how quickly they move or recover from certain moves). You can craft a way you play a certain character around what you like about that character, different characters have different strengths and weaknesses, and the head to head matchups create interesting combinations of those strengths and weaknesses, along with all the various upsets and dramatic tension that comes from seeing any high stakes competitive game.
But you don’t get to customize your character. The character comes pre-built, pre-balanced (you hope). You learn your character. How far they can kick or punch. Who they’re strong against, who they’re weak against. How to read your opponents. And then the super high-level stuff where because both you and your opponent knows what each of your characters’ strengths and weaknesses are, you kind of dance around them, feinting and playing mind games, trying to goad your opponent into playing a move that you can get the upper hand on, one that you can punish.
The lack of customization does not hinder fighting games from being incredibly competitive, addictive, or fun to play.
So most of that isn’t really a game design decision, it’s a business model. After all, I’m basically making an economic argument - buy this game once and you have everything you need to play forever. If we release more characters, more decks, you don’t need them to keep playing. Theoretically a champion with one kind of deck should continue to whomp on players with new and different decks, just through sheer ability, much like a chess champion can pretty consistently beat weaker opponents.
All in all, I’ve tried to keep the rules in Heartbreaker pretty simple.
Destroy all of your opponent’s hearts to win. If at any point all of your hearts are destroyed, you lose and the game is over. However, each heart has a special ability that can only be used after the heart has been destroyed. Once per turn you may exhaust1 any and all of your destroyed hearts. For each heart you exhaust this way you may either: draw or play a card an extra card.
In the examples above the tiny grids on some cards with a black square, some white squares, and a square with an “x” show the range of that card’s attack. The circles in the bottom right corners show what color “gem” the card has - which works similarly to mana, in that having your gems organized in a certain way allows you to cast spell cards.
This is basically all there is to heartbreaker from a rules perspective. The rest of the rules are dealt with on the cards themselves. Games consistent of players playing cards down on the playmat in open spaces or on top of their hearts in order to better defend them. You try to control the space on the board so that you can maneuver around your enemy’s cards. You build “stacks” of cards on top of each other to defend your hearts, or use your space more effectively.
Right now I’ve got about six decks built for playtesting. A rushdown deck. A control deck. A mill deck. A charm deck. A defense deck. And a “void” deck. If you’re interested in getting some of the print files to play yourself, let me know!
Flip the card facedown.↩︎
Published on March 1, 2018.